Call our National Helpline on 0300 0300 363
Check availability times

The UK's leading Shared Parenting charity

Press Releases

Child loses out on relationship with father as top Judge orders bond to be maintained via Skype

Can Skype be a substitute for a meaningful, loving relationship between a child and a parent? This is the absurd question being asked after The President of the Family Courts, in a Supreme Court ruling, maintained that a child could be removed to Australia by their mother and their relationship with their father could be maintained satisfactorily via Skype, despite the father’s appeal that the move would destroy the children’s life with their paternal family.

Last year Sir Nicholas Wall indicated that there was a case for law in this area to be reviewed; however in this judgment Sir Nicholas appears to have made a U-turn. A compelling body of research exists, published by leading academics, psychologists and educationalists, highlighting a risk of harm to children when separated from one parent. This research is routinely ignored by the courts.

Sir Nicholas went on to state the courts will continue to follow guidance first set in the 1970s, despite this guidance being directly challenged by contemporary research.

Craig Pickering, Chief Executive of Families Need Fathers said “despite much criticism by charities, MPs and leading members of the legal profession, the Lord Justice of Appeal refuse to recognise children's needs and rights in relocation cases, and expose children to known harm. A loving and full relationship cannot be maintained via Skype. No parent can carry out their parental responsibilities simply via this technology. ”

In an event at the House of Commons in November 2010, organised by Families Need Fathers, Ann Thomas, Managing Partner of the International Family Law Group, said "How can we, in the English legal profession, have gone so wrong, have failed so many children, have inadvertently engaged in gender discrimination for almost two generations....”

Families Need Fathers disputes Sir Nicholas’s assertion in this recent judgment that relocation cases are determined on facts. Michael Robinson who heads the Relocation Campaign said “The assumptions which underpin judicial reasoning in these cases have not once been supported by expert findings in over 40 years.  The court decides the outcome in relocations based on a 1970’s view of family life which has no relevance two generations later. Most concerning is the court’s refusal to consider expert evidence which contradicts its flawed and out-of-date reasoning. If the courts accept the expert research findings, they must also accept they have subjected thousands of British children to harm”.

Despite assurances that the Family Justice Review would consider the 15 academic research studies which highlight a risk of psychological, educational and emotional harm from relocation, the Review’s interim report published last week made no mention of this much criticised area of family law.

Notes to Editors;

More information is available from the following links:

The published judgement: https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWCA/Civ/2011/345.html

http://www.thecustodyminefield.com/factsheets/relocationcampaignnews.com

http://www.thecustodyminefield.com/Reports/FamilyLaw-Relocation_The_Need_For_Reform.pdf

What do you think?

Send us feedback!

        Forgot Login?  

  Join us now...
Consider a small donation...

If you are using Amazon for purchases, please use their "Smile" programme and select us as the charity they will donate to.

 

What do you think?

Send us feedback!

FNF HSSF Kite Mark Award

Families Need Fathers has been awarded the Help and Support for Separated Families Kite Mark which is a new UK government accreditation scheme for organisations offering help to separated families.

Families Need Fathers work with a range of family law professionals, including Family Law Panel

 

What do you think?

Send us feedback!

Upcoming Events

18/07/2020 Sat: Harrow Branch Meetings
20/07/2020 Mon: Nottingham Meeting
20/07/2020 Mon: London North Meeting (Solicitor Attending)
20/07/2020 Mon: Reading Meeting
20/07/2020 Mon: London Central Meeting
21/07/2020 Tue: Harrow Branch Meetings
22/07/2020 Wed: Cambridge Meeting
25/07/2020 Sat: Harrow Branch Meetings
27/07/2020 Mon: London Central Meeting
28/07/2020 Tue: Harrow Branch Meetings
1/08/2020 Sat: Harrow Branch Meetings
3/08/2020 Mon: Nottingham Meeting
3/08/2020 Mon: Reading Meeting
3/08/2020 Mon: London Central Meeting
4/08/2020 Tue: Harrow Branch Meetings
8/08/2020 Sat: Harrow Branch Meetings
10/08/2020 Mon: London Central Meeting